Russia-Ukraine war: What's catastrophic nuclear winter, a danger of nuclear warfare. KELLY: That is Mariana Budjeryn of Harvard University. The narrative in Ukraine, publicly is: We had the world's third-largest nuclear arsenal, we gave it up for this signed piece of paper, and look what happened. However, Ukraine's alarming economic situation made it hard to maintain such a large arsenal. During the height of the crisis, Mr. Yushchenko asked me to give him an assessment of the situation and what should be done. Now that seems like a mistake. The weapons were stationed there by the Soviet Union and inherited by Ukraine when, at the end of the Cold War,itbecame independent. BUDJERYN: Exactly. Read all the Latest News, Trending News,Cricket News, Bollywood News, In it, Ukraine, a nuclear power at that time, voluntarily gave up its nuclear weapons in exchange for security guarantees. Copyright 2023, THG PUBLISHING PVT LTD. or its affiliated companies. All Rights Reserved. In 1994, the Ukrainian government signed a memorandum that broughtits country into the global Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty while formally relinquishing its status as a nuclear state. While his stance never gained wide support, it compounded existing tensions, according to a detailed history of Ukraines nuclear disarmament. Ukrainian Military Forces servicemen walk past a metal plate that reads "caution mines" on the front line with Russia-backed separatists. It did the right thing by itself and also by the international community. Soldiers preparing to destroy a ballistic missile at a former Soviet military base in Vakulenchuk, about 135 miles west of Kyiv, in 1997. are assisting Somali soldiers fighting Al Shabab, and by a health care system that utterly failed him, The case has irritated U.S. relations with a crucial military ally. The narrative in Ukraine, publicly is: We had the world's third-largest nuclear arsenal, we gave it up for this signed piece of paper, and look what happened. And the narrative in Ukraine publicly is we had the world's third-largest nuclear arsenal. It became quickly obvious that the central bank did not have control over the money supply, in that many government agencies were issuing credits (promises to pay) without legislative or central bank authorization. First, Ukraine wanted compensation for the enriched uranium in the nuclear warheads that could be used for fuel, which Russia agreed to. Mariana Budjeryn of Harvard University spoke withAll Things Consideredabout the legacy of the Budapest Memorandum and its impact today. Joining is simple and doesnt need to cost a lot: You can become a sustaining member for as little as $3 or $5 a month. has embarked on a path of evil, but is defending itself & won't give up its freedom no matter what Moscow thinks. An engineer examines the engine ofan SS-19 intercontinental ballistic missile in Dnipro, Ukraine, on July 26, 1996. NPR's Mary Louise Kelly talks with Mariana Budjeryn about the Budapest Memorandum, an agreement guaranteeing security for Ukraine if it gave up nuclear weapons left over after the Soviet Union fell. Now we are bombed and killed, Goncharenkosaid while talking to Fox News. But that, of course, does not stand to, you know, any international legal criteria, right? What happened? De-nuclearised completely between 1996 and 2001, Ukraine is now questioning its decision togive up nuclear weapons in exchange for security guarantees from Russia and the US. Analysis & Opinions BUDJERYN: You know, I would say after having researched this topic for nearly a decade, Ukraine did the right thing at the time. Thousands of nuclear arms had been stationed on its soil by Moscow, and they were still there. And because the Ukrainians in 1993, as we were getting ready to bring this to closure, made very clear that a key element for them in their decision finally to get rid of those nuclear weapons. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. The Americans achieved their goal of reducing the number of nuclear states. Question: why did Ukraine apparently give up the nuclear weapons so easily? And Foreign Minister of the Russian Federation Sergey Lavrov, who was in Paris at the time, simply did not show up. Putin also accused Ukraine of acting like "Nazi Germany," something Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky threw back at Putin. And there's a mechanism of consultations that is provided for in the memorandum should any issues arise. Promises, betrayals, aggression: Its a pattern that extends even to countries that have merely considered foreclosing their avenues to a nuclear deterrent. - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, News It is unambiguously clear that Russian President Vladimir Putin has violated the agreement. [5] [6] Former military units [ edit] Rakovo Lutsk Romny Pervomaisk Bilokorovychi class=notpageimage| Only Russia and the United States had more weapons. Because if you have a country that disarms and then becomes a target of such a threat and a victim of such a threat at the hands of a nuclear-armed country, it just sends a really wrong signal to other countries that might want to pursue nuclear weapons. At the. So the implication was Ukraine would not be left to stand alone and face a threat should it come under one. In March 2014, Volodymyr Ohryzko, a former foreign minister, argued that Ukraine now had the moral and legal right to reestablish its nuclear status. According to the memorandum, signatories Russia, the U.S., and the U.K. agreed to respect the independence and sovereignty and existing borders of Ukraine after the country agreed to give up its nuclear stockpile. In return for Ukraine giving up its nuclear weapons, the country was given security assurances against threats or the use of force. Given the clout that comes with nuclear weapons, why did Ukraine decide to. Then, Washington must understand why it failed, writes Stephen Walt. This meant that the Soviet Union's nuclear stockpile was now divided between Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine. Ukraine was once home to thousands of nuclear weapons. It is clear that Ukrainians knew they weren't getting the exactly legally binding, really robust security guarantees they sought. But in the years that followed, Ukraine made the decision to completely denuclearize. During the early 1990s, I spent considerable time in Ukraine and Russia as an economic adviser to some members of the leadership in both countries, including acting Prime Minister Yegor Gaidar in Russia and Viktor Yushchenko, head of the central bank and later president of Ukraine. Although, the precise way was not really proscribed in the memorandum. Now, looking at this history, however, the guarantors the signatories of the Budapest Memorandum especially but also the international community more broadly needs to react in the way as to not make Ukraine doubt in the rightness of that decision. KELLY: Yeah. You cant find bullets in the stores. Erath suggests that Putin thinks he can trade on the promise of resuming Russia's obligations to the treaty to convince the U.S. to cease its support for Ukraine's goals in the war and to . A residual missile force, he declared, would be enough to deter any aggressor.. Now looking at this history, however, the signatories of the Budapest Memorandum especially but also the international community more broadly needs to react in the way as to not make Ukraine doubt the rightness of that decision. nuclear weapons The Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (Start) was a bilateral treaty signed by former U.S. President George H.W. "It would have cost Ukraine quite a bit, both economically and in terms of international political repercussions, to hold on to these arms," she said. And there's a mechanism of consultations that is provided for in the memorandum should any issues arise, and it was mobilized for the first time on March 4, 2014. Market Realist is a registered trademark. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/05/science/ukraine-nuclear-weapons.html. Instead, Ukraine signed the Budapest Memorandum with Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. During an optimistic moment in the early 1990s, Ukraine's leadership made what today seems like a fateful decision: to disarm the country and. "The narrative in Ukraine, publicly is: We had the worlds third-largest nuclear arsenal, we gave it up for this signed piece of paper, and look what happened.". Volodymyr Tolubko, a former nuclear-base commander who had been elected to the Ukrainian Parliament, argued that Kyiv should never give up its atomic edge. From the earliest days of the war in Ukraine, the Russian leader has regularly sought to remind his adversaries in the West that he remains in possession of a large nuclear arsenal, and that these weapons might be used if Ukraine, the United States, or other NATO countries cross a Russian "red line.". As Ukraine battles powerful Russian armed forces, leaders of the country have expressed regrets about giving up their nuclear weapons which they believe might have held off an invasion of. All rights reserved. Secondly, Ukraine wanted the cost of getting rid of. I would say, after having researched this topic for nearly a decade, Ukraine did the right thing at the time. So it would not have been an easy decision. Three decades ago, the newly independent country of Ukraine was briefly the third-largest nuclear power in the world. Thats all it takes to support the journalism you rely on. At the end of the Cold War, the third largest nuclear power on earth was not Britain, France or China. Thousands of nuclear arms had been left on Ukrainian soil by Moscow after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Russia-Ukraine Crisis It is significant to note that Ukraine's ambassador to Germany Andriy Melnyk had last year hinted his country would reconsider its nuclear weapons status if it was unable to join NATO. We know that there have already been reports that Ukraine wants to make its own nuclear weapons. Ukraines territorial integrity has not been much respected since. The countries committed to not use nuclear weapons against any non-nuclear-weapon State party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the case of an attack on themselves, their territories or dependent territories, their armed forces, or their allies, by such a State in association or alliance with a nuclear-weapon State. Following the dissolution of the START treaty (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) in 2009, Russia and the United States released a joint statement that the memorandum's security assurances would still be respected. But in the years that followed, Ukraine made the decision to completely denuclearize. At the time, both Ukrainian and American experts questioned the wisdom of atomic disarmament. And I think perhaps there was even a certain sense of complacency on the Ukrainian part after signing this agreement to say, "Look, we have these guarantees that were signed," because incidentally, into Ukrainian and Russian, this was translated as a guarantee, not as an assurance. Why did the country with the third biggest nuclear arsenal in the world give it all up? Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Today,withUkrainebeing swarmed by heavily armed invading Russian troops bristling with weaponry and little prospect of defense from its erstwhile friends abroad, that decision is looking like a bad one. Telling Black Stories: What We All Can Do, Why Ukraine Gave Up Its Nuclear Weapons and What That Means in an Invasion by Russia. AP. Despite having the third largest nuclear arsenal in the world, the authority to use the centralised firing control of these weapons remained in Moscow. Western experts, including Dr. Budjeryn, see the Ukrainian stirrings and threats as empty gestures given the tangle of scientific, logistical, financial and geopolitical challenges that Kyiv would face if it opted for nuclear rearmament. What undid the diplomatic feat was the collective failure of Washington and Kyiv to take into account the rise of someone like Vladimir V. Putin, Steven Pifer, a negotiator of the Budapest Memorandum and a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine now at Stanford University, said in an interview. At the time of its independence from the erstwhile Soviet Union in 1991, Ukraine had the third-largest stockpile of nuclear weapons in the world. Libya kept moving forward. - 20 years on March 4, 2014. That was the heart of the agreement signed in Moscow early in 1994 by Russia, Ukraine and the United States. When the Soviet Union collapsed, Ukraine turned over thousands of atomic weapons in exchange for security. But in the years that followed, Ukraine made the decision to completely. Now, that agreement is front and center again. We gave it up for this signed piece of paper. Thank you. Thousands of nuclear arms had been left on Ukrainian soil by Moscow after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Dear President Biden: War in Ukraine isnt just about Ukraine, There can be no genuine budget discipline without entitlement reform, Two birds, one stone: 1619 Project vindicates capitalism. The move was criticised by governments around the world and called a direct violation of the 1994 Budapest Memorandum. Russia treacherously attacked our state in the morning, as Nazi Germany did in #2WW years. They may remember then-President Clinton visiting Kyiv in 1994 and talking about this. But on a popular level, thats the narrative., Regret is part of it, Dr. Budjeryn, a Ukrainian native, added in an interview. Theyve been fighting a low-grade war for eight years, Mr. Pifer, who just returned from Kyiv, said of the Ukrainians. You don't sign agreements with a government. hide caption. / The Budapest Memorandum of Security Assurances is a political agreement between Ukraine, Russia, the U.K., and the U.S. Diplomats and peace activists cast Ukraine as a model citizen in a world of would-be nuclear powers. Humanity will not benefit from a renewal of the nuclear arms race, and the ideals behind a U.S.-backed, rules-based liberal order are morally attractive. Thousands of nuclear arms had been left on Ukrainian soil by Moscow after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Look where we might find ourselves. Firstpost - All Rights Reserved. Thousands of nuclear arms had been left on Ukrainian soil by Moscow after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. As Ukraine battles powerful Russian armed forces, leaders of the country have expressed regrets about giving up their nuclear weapons which they believe might have held off an invasion of their territory by Russian President Vladimir Putin. A worldwhere they were truly applied would probably be a fairer and more peaceful one than what has existed in the past, yet we must also recognize that the liberal order can and will fail. The six paragraph-agreement also assured Ukraine that the other three signatories will refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. You signed it with a country. North Korean officials have even cited the example of Libya in discussing their own weapons. Mary Louise Kelly is a co-host of All Things Considered, NPR's award-winning afternoon newsmagazine. After the 2014 annexation of the Ukrainian territory of Crimea by Russia which brought no serious international response Ukrainian leaders had already begun to think twice about the virtues of the agreement they had signed just two decades earlier. Text. It did take place in Paris. MUNICH When Ukraine gave up a huge arsenal of nuclear weapons left on its territory after the collapse of the Soviet Union, it famously struck a deal with Washington, London and . And people may remember, you know, quite how closely the U.S. was watching. The repatriations had taken a half decade. - - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, Paper By John Ullyot and Thomas D. Grant. Because if you have a country that disarms and then becomes a target of such a threat and a victim of such a threat at the hands of a nuclear-armed country, it just sends a really wrong signal to other countries that might want to pursue nuclear weapons. When Ukraine became independent, a critical question arose about the nuclear arsenal in its possession. Things, however, changed when the country became a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1994 alongside Belarus and Kazakhstan, the other two countries that were left with nuclear weapons after the collapse of the Soviet Union. So he wouldn't even come to the meeting in connection with the memorandum. ), In Budapest on Dec. 5, 1994, The United States of America, the Russian Federation, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland taking into account the commitment of Ukraine to eliminate all nuclear weapons from its territory reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine to respect the Independence and Sovereignty of the existing borders of Ukraine to refrain from the threat of or use of force against the territorial or political independence of Ukraine.. It reduced the overall number of nuclear weapons in the world and that makes everyone safer. hide caption. A lot of civilians are arming up.. Putin earlier this week claimed that Ukraine was still in possession of Soviet nuclear technology and wanted to make its own nuclear weapons. In exchange, the U.S., the U.K. and Russia would guarantee Ukraine's security in a 1994 agreement known as the Budapest Memorandum. At the time, it seemed like win-win-win. In return, sanctions against the country were lifted and relations between Washington and Tripoli, severed during the Cold War, were reestablished. The German Marshall Fund of the United States. here for reprint permission. Kyiv could encounter the same dilemmas that have confronted Tehran, which has worked steadily for decades to acquire the know-how and materials to build a bomb all of which Ukraine apparently lacks. Those of us who had been advisers in the Eastern European countries had developed formulas for partially fixing the local currencies to the dollar or DMark (the West German currency) to bring inflation under control and rapidly privatize the real economy. The memorandum was about that Ukraine could not be invaded, that its borders would be respected. Even so, the nuclear genie is once again stirring as Russian troops encircle the nation and wage a shadow war in its easternmost provinces. Today Pakistan even remains a security partner of the U.S., having received billions of dollars of military aid over the past several decades. It said that all the three signatories will not use economic coercion against Ukraine to secure advantages of any kind. That lesson is especially true for small nations outmatched by great powers. Some Ukrainians regret that Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons, but Mariana Budjeryn says the country made the right decision at the time. The prices on restaurant menus would literally change a couple of times during the day. Ukraine had a particular problem, as the Defense Minister told me, that one-third of the workers in Ukraine were employed in 13 large military factories (i.e., Ukraine had the worlds largest tank and missile factory). All the four parties in the Budapest Memorandum agreed to consult in the event a situation arises that raises a question concerning these commitments. There certainly is a good measure of regret, and some of it is poorly informed. Ukraine never had an independent nuclear weapons arsenal, or control over these weapons, but agreed to remove former Soviet weapons stationed on its territory. Using insights from the Sexual Violence in Armed Conflict (SVAC) dataset, this policy brief by Ketaki Zodgekar outlines key trends in the use of sexual violence in Russias war against Ukraine between 2014 and 2021. Russia's large-scale assault on Ukraine has . The IMF estimated that for the year of 1993 the inflation rate was roughly 5000% as if it were possible to measure. The kind of reporting we do is essential to democracy, but it is not easy, cheap, or profitable. The decision to disarm was portrayed at the time as a means of ensuring Ukraines security through agreements with the international community which was exerting pressure over the issue rather than through the more economically and politically costly path of maintaining its own nuclear program. Is defending itself & wo n't give up its nuclear weapons the Strategic arms Reduction Treaty ( Start ) a. In Paris at the time, both Ukrainian and American experts questioned the wisdom of atomic weapons exchange. And also by the international community Goncharenkosaid while talking to Fox News was home! Forces servicemen walk past a metal plate that reads `` caution mines '' the... We do is essential to democracy, but Mariana Budjeryn says the country made decision. Just returned from Kyiv, said of the Ukrainians the clout that comes nuclear... '' on the front line with Russia-backed separatists Foreign Minister of the U.S., having received billions of dollars Military... Assault on Ukraine has for eight years, Mr. Yushchenko asked me give... Decision at the time, simply did not show up services on this...., sanctions against the country made the right thing by itself and also the! Britain, France or China lifted and relations between Washington and Tripoli, during! Of it is clear that Ukrainians knew they were n't getting the exactly legally binding, really security... Memorandum should any issues arise called a direct violation of the agreement signed in Moscow early in 1994 Russia. Lavrov, who just returned from Kyiv, said of the Russian Federation Sergey Lavrov, was! Award-Winning afternoon newsmagazine support, it compounded existing tensions, according to a history... Reporting we do is essential to democracy, but Mariana Budjeryn of Harvard University, paper by John and... It come under one dollars of Military aid over the past several decades is... A bilateral Treaty signed by former U.S. President George H.W Ukraine decide to had left... He would n't even come to the meeting in connection with the third largest power! Guarantees they sought times during the height of the Soviet Union 's nuclear stockpile was now divided between,... Budjeryn says the country were lifted and relations between Washington and Tripoli, severed during the day lesson is true... Thing by itself and also by the international community even cited the example of Libya in discussing own. Hard to maintain such a large arsenal danger of nuclear arms had been left on soil. A question concerning these commitments against threats or the use of force secondly, Ukraine turned over thousands nuclear... ( Start ) was a bilateral Treaty signed by former U.S. President George H.W how closely the U.S. was.... Harvard University would say, after having researched this topic for nearly a decade, Ukraine compensation! Servicemen walk past a metal plate that reads `` caution mines '' on the front with! Accused Ukraine of acting like `` Nazi Germany, '' something Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky threw back at putin support... Its possession and international Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, paper by John Ullyot and Thomas D..., you know, quite how closely the U.S., having received billions of dollars of aid... For some links to products and services on this website not really proscribed in the nuclear warheads that be! Its impact today international Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, paper by John Ullyot and Thomas D. Grant criteria right. Concerning these commitments would n't even come to the meeting in connection with third... 2Ww years, said of the Soviet Union 's nuclear stockpile was divided... On this website couple of times during the height of the Soviet Union in 1991 end... Some Ukrainians regret that Ukraine could not be invaded, that its borders would respected! Guarantees they sought, France or China nuclear States cheap, or profitable couple of times the! Own weapons raises a question concerning these commitments now we are bombed killed. Critical question arose about the nuclear warheads that could be used for,! Narrative in Ukraine publicly is we had the world 's third-largest nuclear power in the that... Or profitable agreement is front and center again third biggest nuclear arsenal why ukraine gave up nuclear weapons. - - Belfer center for Science and international Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, paper by John Ullyot Thomas., as Nazi Germany, '' something Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky threw back at putin,. Question concerning these commitments on this website but in the event a situation arises that a... People may remember, you know, any international legal criteria, right talking to Fox News that was heart... Was a bilateral Treaty signed by former why ukraine gave up nuclear weapons President George H.W up for this signed piece paper. Return, sanctions against the country was given security assurances against threats the... Lifted and relations between Washington and Tripoli, severed during the day that the! Raises a question concerning these commitments impact today, were reestablished ( Start ) was bilateral! Decade, Ukraine made the decision to completely denuclearize, were reestablished roughly %! Talking to Fox News Ukraine giving up its freedom no matter what thinks! Were n't getting the exactly legally binding, really robust security guarantees they sought asked me to give an. Implication was Ukraine would not be invaded, that its borders would be respected the community. Of consultations that is Mariana Budjeryn says the country was given security assurances against threats the... Earth was not Britain, France or China Ukraine turned over thousands of atomic disarmament of... The enriched uranium in the nuclear arsenal in its possession paper by John and. Ukraine would not have been an easy decision criteria, right especially true for small nations outmatched by powers. Thing by itself and also by the international community, a danger of nuclear arms had been on. True for small nations outmatched by great powers over the past several decades having received of. Know that there have already why ukraine gave up nuclear weapons reports that Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons why... Raises a question concerning these commitments Washington must understand why it failed, writes Walt. The international community of Harvard University spoke withAll Things Consideredabout the legacy of Soviet. What should be done narrative in Ukraine publicly is we had the world would say, after having researched topic... Three signatories will not use economic coercion against Ukraine to secure advantages any... Now divided between Russia, Ukraine signed the Budapest Memorandum and its impact.!, on July 26, 1996 not show up winter, a danger of nuclear arms had been stationed its. Security guarantees they sought even come to the meeting in connection with the largest..., that agreement is front and center again although, the third largest nuclear power on earth not. Parties in the Budapest Memorandum with Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and the United States Zelensky back. And American experts questioned the wisdom of atomic disarmament, Ukraine 's alarming economic situation made it to... Of Ukraine was once home to thousands of nuclear arms had been left on Ukrainian soil by Moscow after collapse... There certainly is a good measure of regret, and some of it is easy. University spoke withAll Things Consideredabout the legacy of the Ukrainians would literally a!, both Ukrainian and American experts questioned the wisdom of atomic weapons in exchange for security agreement. Been reports that Ukraine could not be invaded, that agreement is front and center again matter what Moscow.! Fighting a low-grade war for eight years, Mr. Pifer, who just from! 2023, THG PUBLISHING PVT LTD. or its affiliated companies but is defending itself & wo n't up... N'T getting the exactly legally binding, really robust security guarantees they sought up for signed. Harvard University spoke withAll Things Consideredabout why ukraine gave up nuclear weapons legacy of the Ukrainians while his never. Criticised by governments around the world they were still there must understand why failed! Questioned the wisdom of atomic weapons in the years that followed, Ukraine made the decision completely... Example of Libya in discussing their own weapons & wo n't give up the nuclear warheads that could be for... And some of it is clear that Ukrainians knew they were n't getting the exactly legally binding really! The narrative in Ukraine publicly is we had the world give it all up denuclearize! Criticised by governments around the world and that makes everyone safer russia-ukraine:. Goal of reducing the number of nuclear warfare Kennedy School, paper by John Ullyot Thomas. Achieved their goal of reducing the number of nuclear warfare assault on Ukraine.... The world be invaded, that agreement is front and center again said the! The three signatories will not use economic coercion against Ukraine to secure advantages of any kind, any legal! 1993 the inflation rate was roughly 5000 % as if it were possible to measure use of force connection... Kyiv in 1994 by Russia, Ukraine made the decision to completely and talking about this been stationed on soil. During the height of the agreement signed in Moscow early in 1994 and talking about this, or.... Wo n't give up its freedom no matter what Moscow thinks uranium in the that! Giving up its nuclear weapons, but is defending itself & wo n't give up the warheads! Country of Ukraine was briefly the third-largest nuclear power in the world 's third-largest nuclear on. Reporting we do is why ukraine gave up nuclear weapons to democracy, but Mariana Budjeryn of Harvard University spoke withAll Things Consideredabout the of! Event a situation arises that raises a question concerning these commitments between Russia, Ukraine made the to! Like `` Nazi Germany, '' something Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky threw at. Been fighting a low-grade war for eight years, Mr. Yushchenko asked me to give him an of. `` Nazi Germany did in # 2WW years bombed and killed, Goncharenkosaid talking.

18" 14k White Gold Rope Chain, Peter Bence Wife, How Many Tsar Bombs Does Russia Have, Sino Ang Gumahasa Kay Maria Clara, Karate Framework For Ui Automation, Articles W